Karl`s PC Help Forums Last active: Never
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

In memory of Karl Davis, founder of this board, who made his final journey 12th June 2007

Post Reply
Who Can Post? All users can post new topics and all users can reply.
Username   Need to register?
Password:   Forgot password?
Subject: (optional)
Icon: [*]
Formatting Mode:

Insert Bold text Insert Italicised text Insert Underlined text Insert Centered text Insert a Hyperlink Insert E-mail Hyperlink Insert an Image Insert Code Formatted text Insert Quoted text Insert List
HTML is Off
Smilies are On
BB Code is On
[img] Code is On
:) :( :D ;)
:cool: :o shocked_yellow :P
confused2 smokin: waveysmiley waggyfinger
brshteeth nananana lips_sealed kewl_glasses
Show All Smilies

Disable Smilies?
Use signature?
Turn BBCode off?
Receive email on reply?
The file size of the attachment must be under 200K.
Do not preview if you have attached an image.

Topic Review

[*] posted on 17-10-2016 at 13:39
War games of one sort or another have been in existence ever since someone decided that it was more humanistic to call 'war-waging' a 'science', i. e., Military Science; if I recall correctly, that was what my college curriculum course listing (way, way back when) called ROTC (Reserve Officer Training Corp) which was mandatory for MEN to graduate (an Army & Air Force branch); that was at a time when the military draft was in effect; it was either a 2 or maybe 4 semester course with a once a week drill of marching in 'close formation'. Talk about sheep to the slaughter.

Nowadays war games are called "Table Top Exercises" (at least some of them); never been to one, but I presume that they are done cause there is the never ending organizational "need" for 'staff training' due to personnel changes such as retirements, newbies coming on board, etc.,. They also serve the real organizational 'need' for personnel evaluation, to include this entity called 'leadership', i. e., the age old problem of getting a disparate group of individuals on the 'same page at the same time', i. e., how to motivate such a group of individuals whose primary instinct is to 'play it safe' and not make a mistake(s) that anyone notices, BUT in the same breadth to roll the dice and gamble in the climb to be 'king of the mountain'.

IMO Table Top exercises are Darwinian endeavors that make, or break, careers, which after all is said and done is basically how to kill as many of 'them' as can be accomplished with the least amount of resources expended as can be done (pretty much like a Sim City program). AND all of this, from the military perspective, has to be done with a political establishment that does NOT have a soul/heart, and even worse has little to no understanding of what is really going on, and really doesn't care to have any of their opinions challenged re workability.

These few paragraphs are my take as to what happened in Vietnam and continue today unabated.

[*] posted on 17-10-2016 at 09:50
I never got into war games, other than the C&C stuff.

Once you worked out a tactic that worked, the computer never managed to change it's approach and you could usually win. Bigger, ballsier machines might do better, I guess. Depends on the level of AI?

[*] posted on 17-10-2016 at 05:17
How does a computer game replicate the complexity of a Mess like Syria. Quite an interesting article drawing a comparison between RL and the current Warfare games for computers.