Karl`s PC Help Forums Last active: Never
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

In memory of Karl Davis, founder of this board, who made his final journey 12th June 2007

Post Reply
Who Can Post? All users can post new topics and all users can reply.
Username   Need to register?
Password:   Forgot password?
Subject: (optional)
Icon: [*]
Formatting Mode:

Insert Bold text Insert Italicised text Insert Underlined text Insert Centered text Insert a Hyperlink Insert E-mail Hyperlink Insert an Image Insert Code Formatted text Insert Quoted text Insert List
HTML is Off
Smilies are On
BB Code is On
[img] Code is On
:) :( :D ;)
:cool: :o shocked_yellow :P
confused2 smokin: waveysmiley waggyfinger
brshteeth nananana lips_sealed kewl_glasses
Show All Smilies

Disable Smilies?
Use signature?
Turn BBCode off?
Receive email on reply?
The file size of the attachment must be under 200K.
Do not preview if you have attached an image.

Topic Review

[*] posted on 4-11-2013 at 15:55
And if you don't like Chickenshocked_yellowshocked_yellowshocked_yellow


[*] posted on 4-11-2013 at 14:19
Originally posted by scholar

If Western countries continue with their expensive ways in medicine, Communist China will replace us in medical technology leadership.

This don't have anything to do with drugs but I have an aversion against putting anything made in China in my mouth.lips_sealed


Not fit for dogs

[*] posted on 3-11-2013 at 12:19
Moved to correct part of forum. This response to Li-fi wasn't on topic as far as I can see but might be interesting enough for its own thread.

[*] posted on 3-11-2013 at 12:09
The key to really common use of technology is to make it cheap. (Usually, to make it affordable is a middle step along the way.)

This is one of the key problems with health care technology. Cheap, widely-used health care treatments (like ibuprofen for inflammation, aspirin for headaches, tylenol for fever) seem rare, compared to expensive, specialized drugs and surgeries. The quandry is, the development of the drugs is financed by the profits to be made while the drug is still under patent. In the U.S., it is terribly expensive to prove that a drug is both effective and harmless, before a government board will approve it for use. And, based on the terribly expensive lawsuits against companies whose drugs are blamed for harm, the board still lets harmful drugs through, anyway, and the expense of the payouts must be met by profits from those drugs or others made by the same company.

I think the public would be better served if the expenses of development were brought down, by reducing the cost of the testing, and by tort reform which would reduce the lawsuit costs.

If Western countries continue with their expensive ways in medicine, Communist China will replace us in medical technology leadership.