Karl`s PC Help Forums Last active: Never
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

In memory of Karl Davis, founder of this board, who made his final journey 12th June 2007

Post Reply
Who Can Post? All users can post new topics and all users can reply.
Username   Need to register?
Password:   Forgot password?
Subject: (optional)
Icon: [*]
Formatting Mode:

Insert Bold text Insert Italicised text Insert Underlined text Insert Centered text Insert a Hyperlink Insert E-mail Hyperlink Insert an Image Insert Code Formatted text Insert Quoted text Insert List
HTML is Off
Smilies are On
BB Code is On
[img] Code is On
:) :( :D ;)
:cool: :o shocked_yellow :P
confused2 smokin: waveysmiley waggyfinger
brshteeth nananana lips_sealed kewl_glasses
Show All Smilies

Disable Smilies?
Use signature?
Turn BBCode off?
Receive email on reply?
The file size of the attachment must be under 200K.
Do not preview if you have attached an image.

Topic Review

[*] posted on 5-8-2015 at 00:20
Jesus came to fulfill the law, Scholar, so, even though "old things have passed away" the law still remains. Which part of the 10 commandments are we not to follow? Luke even teaches that if we give, it shall be given to us. Even Jesus and the 12 were not exactly poor, otherwise why would they need a treasurer (Judas) and why did the others think that he going to give alms on the night he betrayed Jesus. As I said, there is nothing wrong with the money, per se, just the use to which you put it. Even the feeding of the five thousand shows that God supplies our needs, and some. How many baskets of food were left over? Why?

[*] posted on 4-8-2015 at 19:32
"Prosperity theology" is horribly wrong. It is in many respects a polar opposite to the Biblical "theoloy of the cross."

In Yahweh's covenant with the sons of Israel, He did have an agreement to help those faithful to the covenant by blessing their produce and animals. People who withheld their tithes or who broke the Sabbath would not have good crops like those who did keep covenant.

But Israel was a special case, and the Lord did not make such a covenant with believers in general. In fact, Jesus promised that those who followed Him would be persecuted. They were told to expect suffering for His name's sake.

[*] posted on 4-8-2015 at 01:16
It may well seem like that, Mary, but the principles taught are correct. It is the Love of money that is the problem not the money itself. If you listen to these people for what you can get then you've missed the point same as if you go to Church only to feel good (i.e. what you can get). The people of who you refer do tend to come across as money focussed, but I suspect that that is more the American psyche i.e. you gotta worship the almighty greenback than the message being taught.

There is certainly a lot in the Bible about money and it's use. Like any other instrument, it is a tool that can be used for good, or evil. At the end of the day, which God do you serve.

[*] posted on 4-8-2015 at 00:22
Prominent leaders in the development of prosperity theology include E. W. Kenyon, Oral Roberts, TD Jakes, A. A. Allen, Robert Tilton, T. L. Osborn, Joel Osteen, Creflo Dollar, Kenneth Copeland, Reverend Ike and Kenneth Hagin.

Based on non-traditional interpretations of the Bible, often with emphasis on the Book of Malachi, the doctrine views the Bible as a contract between God and humans: if humans have faith in God, he will deliver his promises of security and prosperity. Confessing these promises to be true is perceived as an act of faith, which God will honour.

When I watch these programmes on various "God" channels I feel they prey on the vulnerable.

What do you think?