Karl`s PC Help Forums Last active: Never
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

In memory of Karl Davis, founder of this board, who made his final journey 12th June 2007

Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites   Post new thread Poll:
Author: Subject: It's A Bird; It's Plane; No, It's A Commercial Drone!!!
JackInCT
Custom User Title
*******




Posts: 1482
Registered: 21-4-2007
Theme: KF Blue (Default)
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] Post 504415 posted on 29-8-2016 at 19:04 Reply With Quote
It's A Bird; It's Plane; No, It's A Commercial Drone!!!



It's A Bird; It's Plane; No, It's A Commercial Drone!!!

The keyword in this article is that the weight allowed can be up to "55 lbs"; and you may not want to read the last paragraph re the drone operator NOT having to demonstrate competence (the test noted in this article is a written test, NOT a flight test). By the way, I didn't leave anything out re a liability insurance requirement either. Nor was there anything whether individual USA states could add their own regulations to include simply banning them entirely.

WASHINGTON (AP) — There will be 600,000 commercial drone aircraft operating in the U.S. within the year as the result of new safety rules that opened the skies to them on Monday, according to a Federal Aviation Administration estimate.

The rules governing the operation of small commercial drones were designed to protect safety without stifling innovation, FAA Administrator Michael Huerta told a news conference.

Commercial operators initially complained that the new rules would be too rigid. The agency responded by creating a system to grant exemptions to some of the rules for companies that show they can operate safely, Huerta said.

On the first day the rules were in effect the FAA had already granted 76 exemptions, most of them to companies that want to fly drones at night, Huerta said.

"With these rules, we have created an environment in which emerging technology can be rapidly introduced while protecting the safety of the world's busiest, most complex airspace," he said.

Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx said people are "captivated by the limitless possibilities unmanned aircraft offer." The few thousand commercial drones that had been granted waivers to operate before Monday have been used to monitor crops, inspect bridges and transmission lines, assist firefighters, film movies, and create real estate and wedding videos, among dozens of other uses.

In general, the new rules apply to drones weighing 55 pounds or less, and require commercial operators to:

—Keep the drone within sight at all times.

—Keep drones from flying over people not involved in their operation.

—Limit drone operations to the hours from a half-hour before sunrise to a half-hour after sunset.

—Limit speed to no more than 100 mph.

—Fly no higher than 400 feet.

Drone operators must also pass a test of their aeronautical knowledge administered by the FAA. More than 3,000 people had registered with the FAA to take the test as of Monday.

The Air Line Pilots Association complained that the new regulations are "missing a key component" because there's no requirement that drone operators first have an FAA pilot license to fly a plane. The FAA considered requiring drone operators to have manned aircraft pilot licenses, but relented when the drone industry complained that the time and expense involved in obtaining a license, including considerable time practicing flying a plane, would be prohibitive.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User
Nimuae
Rajkumari
*******


Avatar


Posts: 7028
Registered: 31-8-2002
Location: Free Spirits cannot be confined by locations
Theme: KF Blue
Member Is Offline

Mood: Enigmatic !

[*] Post 504416 posted on 29-8-2016 at 19:51 Reply With Quote


Scary !

Please keep them on your side of the pond.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User
JackInCT
Custom User Title
*******




Posts: 1482
Registered: 21-4-2007
Theme: KF Blue (Default)
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] Post 504418 posted on 29-8-2016 at 21:46 Reply With Quote


Quote:
Originally posted by Nimuae
Scary....


I begin my reply to your post by again noting that I did not edit out/in anything from this article.

Thus I would point out that these regs found it 'necessary' not to interfere in mercantile affairs and in particular those, as pointed out [towardsthe end of the article] for those that want to hire a drone video company for their wedding (hopefully out of doors). Earlier in the article it stated that the drones could NOT overfly people (without giving a distance as to how much offset is required). So I'm wondering just how you could video a wedding and adhere to the non-overflight requirement?

I know, I know: Picky, Picky, Picky!!!!

What I personally find MOST scary is not the drones, but our govt, or what passes for it, and those that are in power. I no doubt am considered a subversive since I don't wish to become EXPENDABLE for some grand cause that I don't understand, etc.,. The govt, on paper/press, is all for human rights except for its own citizens.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User
Post new thread Poll:

Guest Notice
You are a guest, as a guest you can only see a maximum of 3 posts per thread.

If you want to see the rest, please click here to register.