Karl`s PC Help Forums Last active: Never
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

In memory of Karl Davis, founder of this board, who made his final journey 12th June 2007

Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites   Post new thread Poll:
Author: Subject: Apple Vs USA Govt Over Encryption
JackInCT
Custom User Title
*******




Posts: 1484
Registered: 21-4-2007
Theme: KF Blue (Default)
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] Post 501573 posted on 17-2-2016 at 22:25 Reply With Quote
Apple Vs USA Govt Over Encryption



Apple Vs USA Govt Over Encryption

FYI: CNET.com article (02/17/16) on the battle brewing between Apple and USA security agencies.

Apple CEO Tim Cook denounced a federal judge's order to crack open an iPhone used by a terrorist, calling the situation "chilling" and saying it would deal a major setback to online privacy for all.

To hack the phone, the FBI wants Apple to build a new version of its iOS software that Cook claims bypasses the iPhone's security features and creates "the potential to unlock any iPhone in someone's physical possession."

"The US government has asked us for something we simply do not have, and something we consider too dangerous to create," Cook wrote in an open letter posted on Apple's website. "They have asked us to build a backdoor to the iPhone."

On Tuesday, a judge ordered Apple to assist the FBI in unlocking an iPhone linked to December's terrorist attack in San Bernardino, California. Cook warned that such a version of iOS would create, for the first time, a backdoor into all of Apple's encrypted devices and would "undermine the very freedoms and liberty our government is meant to protect."

Encryption is a huge source of tension between tech companies and law enforcement. Companies including Apple, Google and WhatsApp protect the privacy of their customers by encrypting data, often in a way that even the companies themselves cannot unscramble. Although that lets unscrupulous users such as criminals or terrorists communicate without government surveillance, tech companies justify such security measures by insisting that it's impossible to allow law enforcement to crack encryption without opening the door for criminals to do the same.

The FBI's plan would bypass security functions that limit how many times you can enter an incorrect password....

Me here: previous news reports, going back to last year, and some of the revelations re Snowden was that the NSA was reading and storing folks' emails. Not at all sure if they REALLY can to that (and have done so), why the USA security agencies need any help from any digital company to read the files on a phone (or any other digital device)????
View User's Profile View All Posts By User
marymary100
Underwater Plumber
********


Avatar


Posts: 32320
Registered: 9-5-2004
Location: Scotia
Theme: Iconic
Member Is Offline

Mood: fact me

[*] Post 501574 posted on 17-2-2016 at 22:47 Reply With Quote


I'm with Apple on this. I read the full statement and found it very persuasive. The secret services get access to everything courts mandate but they can't mandate Apple to create a backdoor.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User
LSemmens
Undercover MOD
********


Avatar


Posts: 32767
Registered: 19-11-2004
Location: Riverton, South Australia
Theme: Windows XP Silver
Member Is Offline

Mood: Gone crazy, Back soo

[*] Post 501578 posted on 18-2-2016 at 00:29 Reply With Quote


I would hope that common sense would prevail and that Apple, or any other manufacturer, for that fact, is never forced to betray their customers unless, of course this fact is made very public, so that people can act as circumspectly as they desire, given that most of their information is public anyway. Ties in quite well with the petascale thread doesn't it?
View User's Profile View All Posts By User
Post new thread Poll:

Guest Notice
You are a guest, as a guest you can only see a maximum of 3 posts per thread.

If you want to see the rest, please click here to register.