Karl`s PC Help Forums Last active: Never
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

In memory of Karl Davis, founder of this board, who made his final journey 12th June 2007

Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites   Post new thread Poll:
Author: Subject: Should Huckabee be charged?
LSemmens
Undercover MOD
********


Avatar


Posts: 32767
Registered: 19-11-2004
Location: Riverton, South Australia
Theme: Windows XP Silver
Member Is Offline

Mood: Gone crazy, Back soo

[*] Post 396770 posted on 8-12-2009 at 13:10 Reply With Quote
Should Huckabee be charged?



Huckabee pardons a criminal who was to have been locked up for a long time and now the crim murders someone else! Surely there should be consequences for those who recommended his parole!
View User's Profile View All Posts By User
scholar
Knowledge of Ages
*******


Avatar


Posts: 32228
Registered: 14-10-2004
Location: Illinois
Theme: KF Blue (Default)
Member Is Offline

Mood: pensive

[*] Post 396801 posted on 8-12-2009 at 18:08 Reply With Quote


Quote:
Originally posted by LSemmens
Huckabee pardons a criminal who was to have been locked up for a long time and now the crim murders someone else! Surely there should be consequences for those who recommended his parole!
Are you speaking of Clemmons, or DuMond? I'm wondering, because your statement "Huckabee pardons a criminal" is not true of either of them.

DuMond had his sentence reduced by the previous governor of Arkansas--he wasn't pardoned by anybody. Huckabee could have released him with a pardon, but he didn't.

Clemmons did not get a pardon, either. Huckabee looked at his offense when Clemmons was 17, for which he was sentenced to 108 years. Can you imagine him serving the full sentence, and getting out of prison at age 115? Gov. Huckabee also considered the fact that other people who had committed similar crimes usually got sentences which were much lighter. (Remember, killing another person can get you a sentence of 20 years.) Leigh's article does not mention how much the sentence was reduced. I think I remember it was lessened down to 47 years.

Huckabee's commutation to 47 years allowed the parole board to determine whether Clemmons would serve his full sentence in jail, or whether he would ever at some point be released under parole supervision, with the rest of his sentence hanging over him if he should commit another offense.

Clemmons did fool the parole board, the group which actually released him. A worse flaw in the system is in the fact that, when Clemmons was under arrest in Washington, he was allowed to bail out; that should not have been allowed, because he was under warrant for violating his Arkansas parole. Presently, the database which the states use to share information on warrants is oriented toward keeping a fugitive list. When Washington arrested Clemmons, the Arkansas warrant was removed from the list, because he was no longer a fugitive. (Arkansas was not seeking to get Washington to deliver him to them; they were fine with letting them keep him in jail and prosecute him for his new crimes.) The Washington court let Clemmons out on bail set for the crimes for which he was accused in Washington; they did not take into account his Arkansas offences.

That should be fixed.

But, Huckabee did not pardon, OR release, either DuMond or Clemmons.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User
LSemmens
Undercover MOD
********


Avatar


Posts: 32767
Registered: 19-11-2004
Location: Riverton, South Australia
Theme: Windows XP Silver
Member Is Offline

Mood: Gone crazy, Back soo

[*] Post 396927 posted on 9-12-2009 at 10:07 Reply With Quote


Did you read the attached article?
View User's Profile View All Posts By User
Post new thread Poll:

Guest Notice
You are a guest, as a guest you can only see a maximum of 3 posts per thread.

If you want to see the rest, please click here to register.