Karl`s PC Help Forums Last active: Never
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

In memory of Karl Davis, founder of this board, who made his final journey 12th June 2007

Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites   Post new thread Poll:
Author: Subject: Should we give in to terrorists?
TooCute4Words
Look..its me again
*******


Avatar


Posts: 2628
Registered: 7-1-2008
Location: England
Theme: Windows XP Silver
Member Is Offline

Mood: Just plain busy!!!

[*] Post 318280 posted on 27-1-2008 at 17:25 Reply With Quote
Should we give in to terrorists?



Terrorism is very much a part of todays world. 9/11 being one of the worst recent examples of terrorism we have seen :(

But, do you think that we should give in to terrorists in certain cases, when the threat is too great. Maybe negotiate instead of invading a country, like Iraq or Afghanistan

Remember, that 'Terrorists' are generally a group of individuals, rather than the whole population of a country. To kill a load of people, due to a few fanatics seems over-the-top in certain cases. (Not all cases), of course!!

Iraq - comes to mind, among a few others perhaps?

Any views?

Negotiate

or

Attack
View User's Profile View All Posts By User TooCute4Words's Aim
marymary100
Underwater Plumber
********


Avatar


Posts: 32316
Registered: 9-5-2004
Location: Scotia
Theme: Iconic
Member Is Online

Mood: fact me

[*] Post 318281 posted on 27-1-2008 at 17:39 Reply With Quote


What Iraqi terrorists are you talking about? Many of the insurgents are not Iraqi born and those who are would consider themselves freedom fighters.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User
TooCute4Words
Look..its me again
*******


Avatar


Posts: 2628
Registered: 7-1-2008
Location: England
Theme: Windows XP Silver
Member Is Offline

Mood: Just plain busy!!!

[*] Post 318285 posted on 27-1-2008 at 17:51 Reply With Quote


Quote:
Originally posted by marymary100
What Iraqi terrorists are you talking about? Many of the insurgents are not Iraqi born and those who are would consider themselves freedom fighters.


When George W.Bush talks about Iraq and invasion, he talks about terrorists. Most of his speeches contain those two words, 'Iraq' & 'Terrorists'

Correct me, if I'm wrong confused2

W.O.M.D are a threat. Apparently he invaded Iraq for that reason and to sort out Saddam.

Anyway, I didn't start this thread to focus on whether or not 'Iraq' should or should not have been invaded, it is about whether we should spend more time 'negotiating' with terrorists, basically (sorting out a deal), which is kind of complying partly to their demands. Or, should we just get our weapons out and attack and kill at will.

Even if it means killing many thousands of innocent people in the process.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User TooCute4Words's Aim
Post new thread Poll:

Guest Notice
You are a guest, as a guest you can only see a maximum of 3 posts per thread.

If you want to see the rest, please click here to register.