Karl`s PC Help Forums Last active: Never
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

In memory of Karl Davis, founder of this board, who made his final journey 12th June 2007

Post Reply
Who Can Post? All users can post new topics and all users can reply.
Username   Need to register?
Password:   Forgot password?
Subject: (optional)
Icon: [*]
Formatting Mode:
Normal
Advanced
Help

Insert Bold text Insert Italicised text Insert Underlined text Insert Centered text Insert a Hyperlink Insert E-mail Hyperlink Insert an Image Insert Code Formatted text Insert Quoted text Insert List
Message:
HTML is Off
Smilies are On
BB Code is On
[img] Code is On
:) :( :D ;)
:cool: :o shocked_yellow :P
confused2 smokin: waveysmiley waggyfinger
brshteeth nananana lips_sealed kewl_glasses
Show All Smilies

Disable Smilies?
Use signature?
Turn BBCode off?
Receive email on reply?
The file size of the attachment must be under 200K.
Do not preview if you have attached an image.
Attachment:
    

Topic Review
giron

[*] posted on 3-8-2011 at 15:12
He was found to be totally innocent of any wrongdoings and it was decided that he shouldn't have been outed, so they let him off and let him back in again, apparently. confused2
LSemmens

[*] posted on 3-8-2011 at 15:06
In that case, he should be out! The report that I saw did not make that clear, at least, to me!
charles

[*] posted on 3-8-2011 at 14:45
Quote:
Originally posted by LSemmens
Why was he given out? He was not caught, nor was he run out?


He WAS run out.....waggyfinger
LSemmens

[*] posted on 3-8-2011 at 14:39
Why was he given out? He was not caught, nor was he run out?
giron

[*] posted on 2-8-2011 at 18:32
Well, there was Giggsy, I didn't actually see him doing it, but it was reported in the papers.
charles

[*] posted on 2-8-2011 at 17:33
Quote:
Originally posted by Big-Ray


Not the sort of gentlemanly conduct I expect to see in the football over the next few months.

Sadly.
:(


When have you ever seen a footballer cheating ? smokin:
charles

[*] posted on 2-8-2011 at 17:31
Quote:
Originally posted by Big-Ray
To be fair, he was given out.

In the "Spirit of the Game", the Indian team withdrew their appeal, and good for them.

Not the sort of gentlemanly conduct I expect to see in the football over the next few months.

Sadly.
:(




In my opinion, Bell should have said "Thanks very much but I was out,it was a stupid thing I did but I was out"
Big-Ray

[*] posted on 2-8-2011 at 15:30
To be fair, he was given out.

In the "Spirit of the Game", the Indian team withdrew their appeal, and good for them.

Not the sort of gentlemanly conduct I expect to see in the football over the next few months.

Sadly.
:(
giron

[*] posted on 2-8-2011 at 12:53
The poor bloke made an honest mistake, he thought it was lunchtime and was wandering off to the bar for a few beers.
charles

[*] posted on 2-8-2011 at 12:10
Quote:
Originally posted by LSemmens[/i Why should he be given out?






'cos he was.....waggyfinger
LSemmens

[*] posted on 2-8-2011 at 03:43
From the news story, he was given a four, which was then rescinded. I feel that the four should have stood or, if, on appeal, it was, rightly, rescinded, he should not have been given out as the play would not have gotten him out anyway. i.e. ball not caught, not run out - ball did not hit the stumps whilst he was out of his crease. Why should he be given out?
crikey

[*] posted on 31-7-2011 at 18:54
Yes, he should, and the decision should have stood. The law is absolutely clear. Instead, we now have a stupid precedent, set in the spurious name of "sportsmanship", and endorsed by the umpires and team managers. No good will come from this.
charles

[*] posted on 31-7-2011 at 17:55
Should Bell have been given out ? I think he should..waggyfinger