Karl`s PC Help Forums Last active: Never
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

In memory of Karl Davis, founder of this board, who made his final journey 12th June 2007

Post Reply
Who Can Post? All users can post new topics and all users can reply.
Username   Need to register?
Password:   Forgot password?
Subject: (optional)
Icon: [*]
Formatting Mode:
Normal
Advanced
Help

Insert Bold text Insert Italicised text Insert Underlined text Insert Centered text Insert a Hyperlink Insert E-mail Hyperlink Insert an Image Insert Code Formatted text Insert Quoted text Insert List
Message:
HTML is Off
Smilies are On
BB Code is On
[img] Code is On
:) :( :D ;)
:cool: :o shocked_yellow :P
confused2 smokin: waveysmiley waggyfinger
brshteeth nananana lips_sealed kewl_glasses
Show All Smilies

Disable Smilies?
Use signature?
Turn BBCode off?
Receive email on reply?
The file size of the attachment must be under 200K.
Do not preview if you have attached an image.
Attachment:
    

Topic Review
marymary100

[*] posted on 4-10-2017 at 19:05
.
John_Little

[*] posted on 4-10-2017 at 07:26
I signed a friends application for a gun license in my capacity as Trade Union Officer (retired). I wasn't entirely happy about it. Not because he wasn't an upstanding character, but because I sort of feel that anyone who wants to own a gun probably shouldn't be allowed to.
LSemmens

[*] posted on 4-10-2017 at 03:15
When will the American Pollies grow some gonads and place a ban on the unrestricted sale of fire-arms. I've no problem with anyone (who passes stringent ownership requirements) owning a gun. Maybe even two or three if they are a bona-fide member of a shooting club. But the quantity and types of weapons must needs be regulated.
scholar

[*] posted on 4-10-2017 at 00:21
I used the term "automatic weapon" because news reports have mentioned that to be the term for the illegal weapons.

I have now read about the bump-stock, which gives rapid firing without actually being an automatic weapon. Early reports had assumed that an automatic rifle was used because it came to mind due to the speed at which the bullets were fired.

So, I stand corrected by MM.

Katzy, I couldn't tell from your link if the AK-47 was what I understand to be illegal or not. Some people buy guns, legally, that are not set to fire automatically. Then, they buys kits that modify the guns in a way which makes them illegal--but, the gun and the kit were sold separately.
Katzy

[*] posted on 3-10-2017 at 13:34
Apologies, Scholar. I thought an AK 47 was a machine gun.

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/vegas-shooting-massacre-why-happen-las-vegas-gun-show-watch-laws-stephen-paddock-a7980251.ht ml
John_Little

[*] posted on 3-10-2017 at 06:26
What can I say that hasn't been said here and around the World so many times before? When will they ever learn?
marymary100

[*] posted on 3-10-2017 at 06:02
Associated Press are reporting that an accessory known as a bump-stock was discovered in Paddock’s Las Vegas hotel room, which may have enabled him to fire into the crowd at near-automatic levels.
AP are citing two officials on the investigation who spoke on the condition of anonymity. They said two bump-stocks were discovered in Paddock’s room, but were still investigating whether they were actually used in the attack.
The accessory works by using a gun’s own recoil to bump against the user’s trigger finger – enabling an increased rate of fire. With a bump-stock, someone can get around restrictions on automatic weapons by firing a semi-automatic weapon at nearly an automatic rate. Previously, the Guardian’s Lois Beckett spoke to firearms expert Massad Ayoob who speculated that a bump-stock had been involved in the shooting.
While automatic weapons are heavily regulated, semi-automatic guns are widely available and bump-stocks are perfectly legal to buy.
The website of Bump Fire Systems advertised the device for $99.99, saying it permitted “simulated full-auto firing” that was “absolutely legal”.

hth
scholar

[*] posted on 2-10-2017 at 20:55
The automatic weapon that the shooter in Las Vegas used was illegal for anyone outside of the military.

Katzy, why would you say it is legal to buy a machine gun in Nevada?confused2
Katzy

[*] posted on 2-10-2017 at 19:29
In Nevada, it seems it's actually legal to buy a machine gun. Now, tell me... Other than killing lots of living things, why would anyone want a machine gun?

I'm glad America exists, though. That means that there are at least two nations that are more insane than ours.
marymary100

[*] posted on 2-10-2017 at 18:59
= Death (1,719 total)
= Injury (6,510)

1,516 mass shootings in 1,735 days: America's gun crisis – in one chart