Karl`s PC Help Forums Last active: Never
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

In memory of Karl Davis, founder of this board, who made his final journey 12th June 2007

Post Reply
Who Can Post? All users can post new topics and all users can reply.
Username   Need to register?
Password:   Forgot password?
Subject: (optional)
Icon: [*]
Formatting Mode:
Normal
Advanced
Help

Insert Bold text Insert Italicised text Insert Underlined text Insert Centered text Insert a Hyperlink Insert E-mail Hyperlink Insert an Image Insert Code Formatted text Insert Quoted text Insert List
Message:
HTML is Off
Smilies are On
BB Code is On
[img] Code is On
:) :( :D ;)
:cool: :o shocked_yellow :P
confused2 smokin: waveysmiley waggyfinger
brshteeth nananana lips_sealed kewl_glasses
Show All Smilies

Disable Smilies?
Use signature?
Turn BBCode off?
Receive email on reply?
The file size of the attachment must be under 200K.
Do not preview if you have attached an image.
Attachment:
    

Topic Review
John_Little

[*] posted on 29-10-2017 at 12:00
Tell it to The Terminator! Or Robo-cop - the bad one.
Katzy

[*] posted on 29-10-2017 at 09:49
AI in organisations with precious little RI is worrying.
LSemmens

[*] posted on 28-10-2017 at 21:36
Sadly, those laws have already been made redundant by various military's around the world. How many targeted strikes are done without some form of A.I.?
JackInCT

[*] posted on 28-10-2017 at 14:04
I don't recall this board ever having kicked this around for a discussion, but even if it's been cherry picked before, as AI advances with increasing speed, it can't hurt to be up to speed as to what we're in for or NOT in for either.

(1) A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.

(2) A robot must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.

(3) A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.

(4) "promulgated" later: A robot may not harm humanity, or, by inaction, allow humanity to come to harm.

Needless to say any search engine on this would turn up zillions of hits especially of the commentary type responses/reactions to this subject (NONE of which, as far as I can tell, were from a robot but perhaps they are already smart enough to know that they should stay under the radar re being 'discovered').

By the way, somehow or other there doesn't seem to be a fifth law that a robot can't disavow laws 1-4.