Karl`s PC Help Forums Last active: Never
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

In memory of Karl Davis, founder of this board, who made his final journey 12th June 2007

Post Reply
Who Can Post? All users can post new topics and all users can reply.
Username   Need to register?
Password:   Forgot password?
Subject: (optional)
Icon: [*]
Formatting Mode:
Normal
Advanced
Help

Insert Bold text Insert Italicised text Insert Underlined text Insert Centered text Insert a Hyperlink Insert E-mail Hyperlink Insert an Image Insert Code Formatted text Insert Quoted text Insert List
Message:
HTML is Off
Smilies are On
BB Code is On
[img] Code is On
:) :( :D ;)
:cool: :o shocked_yellow :P
confused2 smokin: waveysmiley waggyfinger
brshteeth nananana lips_sealed kewl_glasses
Show All Smilies

Disable Smilies?
Use signature?
Turn BBCode off?
Receive email on reply?
The file size of the attachment must be under 200K.
Do not preview if you have attached an image.
Attachment:
    

Topic Review
TooCute4Words

[*] posted on 20-1-2008 at 22:29
Quote:
Originally posted by marymary100
Google is your friend


Hey Mary, thats cheating fish_slap

Scholar doesn't use Google :D
janet

[*] posted on 20-1-2008 at 22:24
Quote:
Originally posted by Badgergirl
Quote:
Originally posted by SRD
Quote:
Originally posted by janet
In fact, it's not paying for indulgences... it's a continuation of a very old practice...
So spending a load of money to visiting a cave in order to receive benefit isn't paying for them? That's like saying paying the airline fares and hotel rental isn't paying for a holiday.


I agree with you there.

While I know the Church ACTUALLY does not agree with the sale of indulgences, it doesn't do a very good job of letting you know it doesn't want your cash.
The RC Church my School was attached to could make one feel very guilty if you didn't regularly turn out your pockets for whatever they were collecting for. The box was passed 'round publically and we were harranged to give up our lunch money to meet targets.

Most of the time it was for a good cause, but I've heard of an instance (from the parent) of a Child sent home with a box to collect simlply "for priests", with a target written on the side.


Yes - almost certainly an educational fund.

Whether you agree with it or not, someone has to foot the bill for the education of young men for the priesthood.
janet

[*] posted on 20-1-2008 at 22:23
Quote:
Originally posted by SRD
Quote:
Originally posted by janet
In fact, it's not paying for indulgences... it's a continuation of a very old practice...
So spending a load of money to visiting a cave in order to receive benefit isn't paying for them? That's like saying paying the airline fares and hotel rental isn't paying for a holiday.


No - because that's not what's being paid for and the people involved are smart enough to see the difference.

Or are you suggesting that they are not?

It's not just a cave - it is a place that has a great deal of importance for those who go there.

I'm assuming you don't share their belief - that's up to you.

But they *do* believe and choose to make the journey, which is up to them.
Badgergirl

[*] posted on 20-1-2008 at 19:54
Quote:
Originally posted by SRD
Quote:
Originally posted by janet
In fact, it's not paying for indulgences... it's a continuation of a very old practice...
So spending a load of money to visiting a cave in order to receive benefit isn't paying for them? That's like saying paying the airline fares and hotel rental isn't paying for a holiday.


I agree with you there.

While I know the Church ACTUALLY does not agree with the sale of indulgences, it doesn't do a very good job of letting you know it doesn't want your cash.
The RC Church my School was attached to could make one feel very guilty if you didn't regularly turn out your pockets for whatever they were collecting for. The box was passed 'round publically and we were harranged to give up our lunch money to meet targets.

Most of the time it was for a good cause, but I've heard of an instance (from the parent) of a Child sent home with a box to collect simlply "for priests", with a target written on the side.
SRD

[*] posted on 15-1-2008 at 22:09
Quote:
Originally posted by janet
In fact, it's not paying for indulgences... it's a continuation of a very old practice...
So spending a load of money to visiting a cave in order to receive benefit isn't paying for them? That's like saying paying the airline fares and hotel rental isn't paying for a holiday.
janet

[*] posted on 15-1-2008 at 22:06
In fact, it's not paying for indulgences... it's a continuation of a very old practice...
SRD

[*] posted on 15-1-2008 at 18:29
I found this: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/7131088.stm which although not directly paying for an indulgence must encourage a number of people to attend (and therefore spend money so to do) during the period involved.
janet

[*] posted on 15-1-2008 at 17:10
Quote:
Originally posted by marymary100
Google is your friend


Yes - as is the Catechism of the Catholic Church
marymary100

[*] posted on 15-1-2008 at 17:03
Google is your friend
janet

[*] posted on 15-1-2008 at 16:44
No, is the simple answer. And the name of the denomination is the Roman Catholic Church. Courtesy costs nothing.

She may not have been kidding - she may have been wrong, misinformed, out to stir trouble or some other thing.
scholar

[*] posted on 15-1-2008 at 16:15
Are indulgences still available for purchase from the Roman Church?

A Roman Catholic on a talk show just mentioned that her grandmother bought some for her. (Was she kidding? If she was kidding, is it nonetheless the case that they are still sold?)