Karl`s PC Help Forums Last active: Never
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

In memory of Karl Davis, founder of this board, who made his final journey 12th June 2007

Post Reply
Who Can Post? All users can post new topics and all users can reply.
Username   Need to register?
Password:   Forgot password?
Subject: (optional)
Icon: [*]
Formatting Mode:
Normal
Advanced
Help

Insert Bold text Insert Italicised text Insert Underlined text Insert Centered text Insert a Hyperlink Insert E-mail Hyperlink Insert an Image Insert Code Formatted text Insert Quoted text Insert List
Message:
HTML is Off
Smilies are On
BB Code is On
[img] Code is On
:) :( :D ;)
:cool: :o shocked_yellow :P
confused2 smokin: waveysmiley waggyfinger
brshteeth nananana lips_sealed kewl_glasses
Show All Smilies

Disable Smilies?
Use signature?
Turn BBCode off?
Receive email on reply?
The file size of the attachment must be under 200K.
Do not preview if you have attached an image.
Attachment:
    

Topic Review
SRD

[*] posted on 8-2-2008 at 08:39
There was an item about this on the 'Today' programme on BBC Radio4 this morning between 8.20am - 8.30am, anyone interested might want to 'Listen Again'.
Redwolf5150

[*] posted on 30-1-2008 at 02:08
Quote:
Originally posted by Dreamweaver
Quote:
Originally posted by Redwolf5150
Quote:
Originally posted by Dreamweaver
It also says "and were known to photograph staged maneuvers, a common practice at the time." much the same as today's photographer "airbrushes" or enhances photos as common practice.
You practice whatever is the "norm" of your time. It dosn't detract from the power or the value of the photography.


Photojournalists who use these practices become pretty much pirriahs in the field once exposed.

I can think of several incidents that have happened in the last year, most coming out of the Middle East.

What was once an "accepted practice" isn't the case today.

Doesn't make the discovery of these negatives any less exciting.

It's on a par with finding a trunk full of Matthew Brady negatives (he, by the limits of the medium at the time HAD to pose his subjects).

kewl_glasses


Did you just repeat what I said ? :P


I was attempting to enhance what you said.

:D
Dreamweaver

[*] posted on 30-1-2008 at 01:50
Quote:
Originally posted by Redwolf5150
Quote:
Originally posted by Dreamweaver
It also says "and were known to photograph staged maneuvers, a common practice at the time." much the same as today's photographer "airbrushes" or enhances photos as common practice.
You practice whatever is the "norm" of your time. It dosn't detract from the power or the value of the photography.


Photojournalists who use these practices become pretty much pirriahs in the field once exposed.

I can think of several incidents that have happened in the last year, most coming out of the Middle East.

What was once an "accepted practice" isn't the case today.

Doesn't make the discovery of these negatives any less exciting.

It's on a par with finding a trunk full of Matthew Brady negatives (he, by the limits of the medium at the time HAD to pose his subjects).

kewl_glasses


Did you just repeat what I said ? :P
Redwolf5150

[*] posted on 27-1-2008 at 20:12
Quote:
Originally posted by Dreamweaver
It also says "and were known to photograph staged maneuvers, a common practice at the time." much the same as today's photographer "airbrushes" or enhances photos as common practice.
You practice whatever is the "norm" of your time. It dosn't detract from the power or the value of the photography.


Photojournalists who use these practices become pretty much pirriahs in the field once exposed.

I can think of several incidents that have happened in the last year, most coming out of the Middle East.

What was once an "accepted practice" isn't the case today.

Doesn't make the discovery of these negatives any less exciting.

It's on a par with finding a trunk full of Matthew Brady negatives (he, by the limits of the medium at the time HAD to pose his subjects).

kewl_glasses
LSemmens

[*] posted on 27-1-2008 at 13:14
Who cares whether some of the photos were staged or not! This is an exciting find and will shed some light on some lingering questions, and, no doubt, will raise many more! It's pleasing to see that they will now be accorded the same respect as many other "works of art".
marymary100

[*] posted on 27-1-2008 at 10:48
There were also claims that raising the flag on Iwo Jima had been staged. However, there is a film version taken at the same time which proves this to be not the case. second flag raising
Dreamweaver

[*] posted on 27-1-2008 at 10:45
It also says "and were known to photograph staged maneuvers, a common practice at the time." much the same as today's photographer "airbrushes" or enhances photos as common practice.
You practice whatever is the "norm" of your time. It dosn't detract from the power or the value of the photography.
janet

[*] posted on 27-1-2008 at 10:33
One is tempted to mention the well known fraud of lemmings being filmed going over a cliff.....
SRD

[*] posted on 27-1-2008 at 08:38
That raises an interesting point scholar: 'Can any man really be independent in his actions from his beliefs?'
scholar

[*] posted on 27-1-2008 at 02:18
The article says he was a Communist who showed which side he favored in his work, and who staged pictures.

There are certainly journalists in modern times who follow similar practices--like the ones who broadcast terrorist propaganda films films (such as the one in which a terrorist tells his men in English not to attack, because of the harm to innocent people--even though hiding among civilians and fighting from hospitals was a standard strategy from the earliest fighting).

He may have shown great bravery, and gotten many excellent shots; the negatives may have great historical value. Still, I'd rather have read an example of a person who did not stage his photos, but rather took a fair sampling of whatever really happened.:)

Redwolf, however much you respect this pioneer, I have no doubt you hold yourself to higher journalistic standards. Your integrity shows in the restraint in your posts on some issues in which you and I personally disagree;)

Perhaps you'll be able to tell me that he advanced journalism in his day, and the standards have improved even more for quality journalism since then. :)
Redwolf5150

[*] posted on 27-1-2008 at 00:29
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/27/arts/design/27kenn.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

This guy was the DEAN of modern war photography. The discovery these negatives exist and that they are heading to a place where they can be properly preserved is great.

kewl_glasses