Karl`s PC Help Forums Last active: Never
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

In memory of Karl Davis, founder of this board, who made his final journey 12th June 2007

Post Reply
Who Can Post? All users can post new topics and all users can reply.
Username   Need to register?
Password:   Forgot password?
Subject: (optional)
Icon: [*]
Formatting Mode:
Normal
Advanced
Help

Insert Bold text Insert Italicised text Insert Underlined text Insert Centered text Insert a Hyperlink Insert E-mail Hyperlink Insert an Image Insert Code Formatted text Insert Quoted text Insert List
Message:
HTML is Off
Smilies are On
BB Code is On
[img] Code is On
:) :( :D ;)
:cool: :o shocked_yellow :P
confused2 smokin: waveysmiley waggyfinger
brshteeth nananana lips_sealed kewl_glasses
Show All Smilies

Disable Smilies?
Use signature?
Turn BBCode off?
Receive email on reply?
The file size of the attachment must be under 200K.
Do not preview if you have attached an image.
Attachment:
    

Topic Review
DeWitch

[*] posted on 4-2-2009 at 16:42
Quote:
Originally posted by LSemmens
I had a friend who also liked 'puters, we'd get on the phone and talk for hours. One evening, she rang and on of my sons answered the phone and the yelled out "dad, it's your girlfriend on the phone". We had a good laugh about it, she is stilll "my girlfriend" although we don't often talk these days.

KIDS!!!
ha ha ha
LSemmens

[*] posted on 4-2-2009 at 09:21
I had a friend who also liked 'puters, we'd get on the phone and talk for hours. One evening, she rang and on of my sons answered the phone and the yelled out "dad, it's your girlfriend on the phone". We had a good laugh about it, she is stilll "my girlfriend" although we don't often talk these days.
DeWitch

[*] posted on 3-2-2009 at 14:05
Quote:
Originally posted by LSemmens
It was worth a try! He seems to have lots of girls who are friends, but has yet to find the perfect lady. I certainly wouldn't try and play "match maker", he reminds me of me when I was younger.
It is good to have friends of the opposite sex too:)
I had several male friends when I was younger, of course many of the other girls hated me for it :D
LSemmens

[*] posted on 3-2-2009 at 11:37
It was worth a try! He seems to have lots of girls who are friends, but has yet to find the perfect lady. I certainly wouldn't try and play "match maker", he reminds me of me when I was younger.
DeWitch

[*] posted on 2-2-2009 at 13:21
Quote:
Originally posted by LSemmens
Did I mention that he was eligible?

Unfortunately I have no daughters (or sons for that matter) so do not know any young girls since I don't go out much any more.
LSemmens

[*] posted on 2-2-2009 at 10:38
Did I mention that he was eligible?
DeWitch

[*] posted on 2-2-2009 at 00:32
Quote:
Originally posted by LSemmens
If you are prepared to pay, I'm sure he would. He needs a new job, as his body is suffering from the job that he is currently doing. He works in Sound, Video and Lighting, doing conferences, concerts and the like. The nature of the industry here is that you don't just operate the desks, you help set up too!

Wish I could:)
DeWitch

[*] posted on 2-2-2009 at 00:32
Quote:
Originally posted by ErraticToad
Quote:
Originally posted by DeWitch
Would he like to come to NH for a while????


Where's NH?

If it's somewhere exotic then sign me up :)

in the frosty northeast of the USA
LSemmens

[*] posted on 1-2-2009 at 06:55
If you are prepared to pay, I'm sure he would. He needs a new job, as his body is suffering from the job that he is currently doing. He works in Sound, Video and Lighting, doing conferences, concerts and the like. The nature of the industry here is that you don't just operate the desks, you help set up too!
ErraticToad

[*] posted on 1-2-2009 at 04:50
Quote:
Originally posted by DeWitch
Would he like to come to NH for a while????


Where's NH?

If it's somewhere exotic then sign me up :)
DeWitch

[*] posted on 31-1-2009 at 13:39
Quote:
Originally posted by LSemmens
Thanks for that. When I have more time (unlikely in this lifetime), I may spend more time learning about router security and stuff. Meantime, I have sons who are more than capable of doing this, one of whom actually lives with us for the moment.

Would he like to come to NH for a while????
LSemmens

[*] posted on 31-1-2009 at 10:38
Thanks for that. When I have more time (unlikely in this lifetime), I may spend more time learning about router security and stuff. Meantime, I have sons who are more than capable of doing this, one of whom actually lives with us for the moment.
ErraticToad

[*] posted on 30-1-2009 at 21:58
Quote:
Originally posted by LSemmens
Just a question, ET, would also using a fixed TCP/IP address on each PC in your network and then only permitting those addies through your router also increase security?


Yes and no. IP spoofing is one of the easier tasks that the bogey man undertakes, though what could help is to restrict your dhcp server to the relevant number of devices.

Every step you take does help, but nothing as we find out daily, is impossible to defeat given time.
DeWitch

[*] posted on 30-1-2009 at 17:13
Quote:
Originally posted by ErraticToad
Typically you get an option within the wireless setup of your router to do this. Usually it's a tick box.

However, a better option is if you get a good signal in the places you use wireless and your router has the option, then decrease the antenna transmit power - does what it says.

Best bet - make sure you are using WPA2 as a minimum and have a complicated PSK String which you change on a regular basis.

On top of this another option might be to filter by MAC (helps a little) and set your wi-fi mode to the one you use rather than broadcasting all options.

YIKES
ummm....
I think it would be easier to just move to where the neighbors were even further away (like in out of sight completely:)
Which we hope to do anyway
LSemmens

[*] posted on 30-1-2009 at 10:53
Just a question, ET, would also using a fixed TCP/IP address on each PC in your network and then only permitting those addies through your router also increase security?
ErraticToad

[*] posted on 29-1-2009 at 23:50
Typically you get an option within the wireless setup of your router to do this. Usually it's a tick box.

However, a better option is if you get a good signal in the places you use wireless and your router has the option, then decrease the antenna transmit power - does what it says.

Best bet - make sure you are using WPA2 as a minimum and have a complicated PSK String which you change on a regular basis.

On top of this another option might be to filter by MAC (helps a little) and set your wi-fi mode to the one you use rather than broadcasting all options.
DeWitch

[*] posted on 28-1-2009 at 16:22
Quote:
Originally posted by ErraticToad
Quote:
, and if you wanted, hide your SSID.


This does nothing to anyone sniffing for wifi packets.

Every packet your wifi sends out has to, by necessity and design, send the SSID each time.

Hiding your SSID just stops your neighbour (for example) not finding your AP when they do a 'show available wi-fi networks'. It doesn't make it not there.

Hi there :)
How DO you hide the SSID
DuhWitch here;)
ErraticToad

[*] posted on 28-1-2009 at 16:12
Quote:
, and if you wanted, hide your SSID.


This does nothing to anyone sniffing for wifi packets.

Every packet your wifi sends out has to, by necessity and design, send the SSID each time.

Hiding your SSID just stops your neighbour (for example) not finding your AP when they do a 'show available wi-fi networks'. It doesn't make it not there.
DeWitch

[*] posted on 10-11-2008 at 15:17
Thank you all for your help
Daz

[*] posted on 28-10-2008 at 01:04
As T said.

Hardwired, providing it's hooked up to a NAT Router first... If it's Modem to Computer you're only relying on the software firewall to protect you, which isn't ideal really...

Otherwise, WiFi, as it would be going through a NAT Router, thus giving you the protection... (Providing your security measures are set properly.) WPA/WPA2 is much more secure than WEP, and maybe use MAC filtering as well, and if you wanted, hide your SSID.
Theravad

[*] posted on 27-10-2008 at 21:49
Quote:
Originally posted by DeWitch
Which PC would be more susceptible to being "hacked"?
PC with direct cable connection (firewalled)
PC with wireless cable connection (also firewalled)


If the direct cable connection gives the PC an internet address (rather than NAT private address) and the WiFi is secured, then the WiFi is less risk.

T
dr john

[*] posted on 27-10-2008 at 21:47
Wireless to cable, by a neighbour or someone sitting in a car nearby.
Apart from the above they are equal in all other cases.
DeWitch

[*] posted on 27-10-2008 at 16:52
Which PC would be more susceptible to being "hacked"?
PC with direct cable connection (firewalled)
PC with wireless cable connection (also firewalled)