Karl`s PC Help Forums Last active: Never
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

In memory of Karl Davis, founder of this board, who made his final journey 12th June 2007

Post Reply
Who Can Post? All users can post new topics and all users can reply.
Username   Need to register?
Password:   Forgot password?
Subject: (optional)
Icon: [*]
Formatting Mode:
Normal
Advanced
Help

Insert Bold text Insert Italicised text Insert Underlined text Insert Centered text Insert a Hyperlink Insert E-mail Hyperlink Insert an Image Insert Code Formatted text Insert Quoted text Insert List
Message:
HTML is Off
Smilies are On
BB Code is On
[img] Code is On
:) :( :D ;)
:cool: :o shocked_yellow :P
confused2 smokin: waveysmiley waggyfinger
brshteeth nananana lips_sealed kewl_glasses
Show All Smilies

Disable Smilies?
Use signature?
Turn BBCode off?
Receive email on reply?
The file size of the attachment must be under 200K.
Do not preview if you have attached an image.
Attachment:
    

Topic Review
John Barnes

[*] posted on 23-4-2011 at 14:52
maybe the correct address is

Workforce Central Illinois Director Gary J. Eorl defends the program, .
LSemmens

[*] posted on 23-4-2011 at 13:12
Quote:
Workforce Central Florida Director Gary J. Earl defends the program, ......
Not related to anyone here, hmmmmmmmmmm!
giron

[*] posted on 23-4-2011 at 10:18
Just a ruddy moment, that can't be right ! shocked_yellow

Well, the bit about the number of breaks might but right, but forcing me back to work isn't. waggyfinger
marymary100

[*] posted on 23-4-2011 at 09:28
Quote:
Originally posted by giron

Naturally, GPO pensioners should be exempt from paying tax, as I'm sure you'd agree.
I think you should be forced back into employment till you're 90 to make up for the number of breaks you took while employed - Cameron has asked me to join a think tank as the caring face of the Tory party...
giron

[*] posted on 22-4-2011 at 18:09
Don't despair, Matilda, I'm fairly certain our taxes don't go to support work shy Americans.
They're used to support our own shirkers and provide money for bankers bonuses, as well as bailing the banks out in the first place.

Naturally, GPO pensioners should be exempt from paying tax, as I'm sure you'd agree.
marymary100

[*] posted on 22-4-2011 at 17:26
They'd be better to give superhero capes to those of us who do work and pay taxes!
giron

[*] posted on 22-4-2011 at 11:03
Once a cab driver, always a cab driver. ;)


[bad img]http://img40.imageshack.us/img40/624/2235943u7q5zsl3.jpg[/bad img]
John Barnes

[*] posted on 22-4-2011 at 01:06
Now that is funny. giron but I think with an outfit like that Eorl would fly his customers to their destinations .he would not need to do taxiing any more especially with his 4 day food allowance from O'barmy
giron

[*] posted on 21-4-2011 at 08:57
[bad img]http://img251.imageshack.us/img251/9773/2114758g1ppgs5y.jpg[/bad img]
Faolan

[*] posted on 21-4-2011 at 08:03
Think of it this way, at least you'll have a roof over your head when they evict you...

It's all part of the Cunning Plan, it's so Cunning that even they don't understand it!
giron

[*] posted on 20-4-2011 at 19:52
But would wearing a cape be a good enough disguise to fool the ever vigilant IRS investigators that tirelessly work to seek out tax evaders ?
John Barnes

[*] posted on 20-4-2011 at 19:35
Who would actually wear such a cape? Taxi drivers ?
giron

[*] posted on 20-4-2011 at 19:31
Quote:
Originally posted by scholar


Certainly, such m9ney could have been put to better use!


Yes, the money should have been given directly to those work shy scroungers so they could spend it on alcohol and drugs !
scholar

[*] posted on 20-4-2011 at 19:26
Here is the article.

An employment agency gave 6000 superhero capes to unemployed people, to inspire them to fight the fictional comic-book-type villain Dr. Evil Unemployment.

The capes cost thousands of dollars.:(


Who would actually wear such a cape?confused2

Certainly, such money could have been put to better use!